Inter-Research > ESR > v34 > p167-183  
ESR
Endangered Species Research

via Mailchimp

ESR 34:167-183 (2017)  -  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00843

East or west: the energetic cost of being a gray whale and the consequence of losing energy to disturbance

S. Villegas-Amtmann1,*, L. K. Schwarz2, G. Gailey3, O. Sychenko3, D. P. Costa

1Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA
2Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA
3Texas A&M University, Galveston, TX 77553, USA
*Corresponding author:

ABSTRACT: Western gray whales (WGW) Eschrichtius robustus are considered one of the world’s most endangered baleen whale populations. Development of oil and gas fields in northeastern Sakhalin, Russia, is a concern, because they overlap with WGW feeding grounds. Some WGW migrate ~10000 km from feeding grounds around Sakhalin Island (Russia), to breeding grounds in Baja California (BajaC; Mexico) and possibly ~6000 km to the South China Sea (China). We developed a WGW female bioenergetics model to examine potential consequences of energy lost from foraging cessation caused by anthropogenic disturbance, and compared it to eastern gray whales (EGW). Energy loss was then linked to potential reductions in reproduction and survival. Mean total energy requirements were 11 and 15% greater for WGW breeding in BajaC and China, respectively, compared to EGW, due to longer migration distance (25%) to BajaC and higher metabolic rates at foraging grounds. However, this difference is minimal for EGW that use the northern extent of their foraging range. On average, WGW breeding in BajaC and China need 9 and 17% more energy for survival than EGW. Our model predicts that WGW mortality would likely occur at 38 to 40% annual energetic loss. Long-term yearly energy loss of <30% would reduce population growth due to lower reproductive rates. Ongoing yearly energy losses of >30% would result in adult female mortality the first year, followed by lower reproductive rates of survivors. Our model suggests that energy losses of >30% caused by disturbance should be considered a threshold for concern for this Critically Endangered population.


KEY WORDS: Western gray whale · Eschrichtius robustus · Bioenergetics · Disturbance costs · Metabolic rate · Reproductive costs · Migration costs · Foraging costs · Energy loss


Full text in pdf format
Supplementary material
Cite this article as: Villegas-Amtmann S, Schwarz LK, Gailey G, Sychenko O, Costa DP (2017) East or west: the energetic cost of being a gray whale and the consequence of losing energy to disturbance. Endang Species Res 34:167-183. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00843

Export citation
Share:    Facebook - - linkedIn

 Previous article Next article