Inter-Research > MEPS > v216 > p95-108  
MEPS
Marine Ecology Progress Series

via Mailchimp

MEPS 216:95-108 (2001)  -  doi:10.3354/meps216095

Spatio-temporal variability of zooplankton community structure off east Antarctica (90 to 160°E)

S. Chiba1,*, T. Ishimaru2, G. W. Hosie3, M. Fukuchi4

1Frontier Research System for Global Change, 3173-25 Showamachi, Kanazawaku, Yokohamashi, 236-0001, Japan
2Tokyo University of Fisheries, 4-5-7 Konan, Minatoku, 105-8477, Japan
3Australian Antarctic Division, Channel Highway, Kingston 7050, Australia
4National Institute of Polar Research, 1-9-10 Kaga, Itabashiku, 173-8515, Japan

ABSTRACT: Spatio-temporal variability of zooplankton community structure off east Antarctica (90 to 160°E) was studied from 1988 to 1996 based on samples collected by the Japanese icebreaker ŒShirase¹. Three community groups with distinctive species compositions were obtained by cluster analysis. Group 1 was defined as the ŒSubantarctic community¹ because it appeared exclusively north of the Polar Front, and indicator species of the group included Eucalanus longiceps and Limacina retroversa, which are typical subantarctic species. Groups 2a and 2b occurred in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC), and are thus defined as the ŒACC communities¹. All indicator species for Group 2b, including large copepods, Calanoides acutus, Calanus propinquus and Metridia gerlachei, were also common indicators for Group 2a. In Group 2a, smaller copepods (small calanoids, cyclopoids and poecilostomatoids) and non-copepod herbivores were also indicators. Total abundance was markedly high in Group 2a, and copepods numerically dominated all 3 groups (>70% in Group 1, >80% in 2a, >90% in 2b). The longitudinal distribution pattern of Groups 2a and 2b varied between years, although they occurred along the same latitude. Multiple-regression analysis on environmental variables and distribution of the groups demonstrated that Group 2a tended to occur in relatively warm water masses with high chlorophyll a and low silicate concentrations. While Group 2b occurred in colder areas with low chlorophyll a concentrations, the results of this study suggest that the occasional intrusion of northern water further south caused by meandering of the ACC might have been responsible for the observed distribution patterns of the zooplankton community.


KEY WORDS: Zooplankton · Community structure · Multivariate analysis · JARE · Antarctic Ocean · Antarctic Circumpolar Current


Full text in pdf format
 Previous article Next article