MEPS 370:271-284 (2008)  -  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07660

Foraging ecology of the Cook’s petrel Pterodroma cookii during the austral breeding season: a comparison of its two populations

M. J. Rayner1,*, M. E. Hauber1, M. N. Clout1, D. S. Seldon1, S. Van Dijken1, S. Bury2, R. A. Phillips3

1School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
2National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, PO Box 14-901, Kilbernie, Wellington 6011, New Zealand
3British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OET, UK

ABSTRACT: This study examined divergence in the foraging distribution, at-sea behaviour and provisioning strategies of a small procellarid, the Cook’s petrel Pterodroma cookii, during chick-rearing at 2 islands off New Zealand, separated latitudinally by ~1000 km. There was little overlap in foraging distribution between adults from Little Barrier Island (LBI), which ranged to the west into the Northern Tasman Sea and east into the Pacific Ocean, and conspecifics from Codfish Island (CDF), which foraged west of the South Island in the south Tasman Sea in association with the subtropical convergence zone. Although birds from CDF ranged further than those from LBI, there was no difference in mean foraging trip duration. Cook’s petrels from CDF foraged over deeper, cooler water, with higher primary productivity, than conspecifics from LBI. At-sea behaviour also differed: adults from LBI spent less time in flight, and showed less variation in total flight time per day. Overall, Cook’s petrels spend much more time in flight than albatrosses, and approximately the same amounts of time on the water during the night as during the day, suggesting a high portion of nocturnal foraging. Dive depths did not differ between colonies but were greater than expected for a gadfly petrel. Stable isotope signatures of blood indicated population-specific diets, and suggested that birds from LBI primarily consume cephalopods and fish, whereas those from CDF eat more crustaceans. Chicks at CDF received more food. These results suggest a broad divergence in foraging strategies between geographically well-separated colonies in response to regional differences in oceanography.


KEY WORDS: Foraging distribution · Geolocation loggers · Stable isotopes · Subtropical convergence · Gadfly petrel


Full text in pdf format 
Cite this article as: Rayner MJ, Hauber ME, Clout MN, Seldon DS, Van Dijken S, Bury S, Phillips RA (2008) Foraging ecology of the Cook’s petrel Pterodroma cookii during the austral breeding season: a comparison of its two populations. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 370:271-284. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07660

Export citation
Mail this link - Contents Mailing Lists - RSS
- -