MEPS 563:25-33 (2017)  -  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11980

Phytoplankton primary productivity around submarine groundwater discharge in nearshore coasts

Ryo Sugimoto1,*, Katsuhiro Kitagawa1, Saori Nishi1, Hisami Honda1,2, Makoto Yamada2, Shiho Kobayashi3, Jun Shoji4, Shinji Ohsawa5, Makoto Taniguchi2, Osamu Tominaga1

1Faculty of Marine Biosciences, Fukui Prefectural University, Obama, Fukui 917-0003, Japan
2Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto 603-8047, Japan
3Field Science Education and Research Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-0068, Japan
4Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 739-8528, Japan
5Institute for Geothermal Sciences, Kyoto University, Oita 874-0903, Japan
*Corresponding author:

ABSTRACT: Nutrients supplied from submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) are generally thought to enhance primary production in coastal seas. However, there is little evidence for a direct association between SGD and phytoplankton primary productivity. To elucidate the response of in situ primary productivity to SGD, we conducted comparative experiments at 3 coastal sites in Japan with different SGD types (Site A: Obama Bay; Site B: coast along the western foot of Mt. Chokai; Site C: Beppu Bay) during the summers of 2013-2015. At Site A, which is characterized by seepage-type SGD, we found a significant positive relationship between in situ primary productivity and 222Rn concentration. This was likely driven by nutrient-limited water column conditions. On the other hand, at the volcanic coastal Sites B and C, which are dominated by spring-type SGD, no clear relationships between in situ primary productivity and 222Rn concentration were found. Although significant relationships between nutrient concentrations and 222Rn concentration suggest that SGD acts as a primary nutrient source in these regions, the non-trivial influence of light availability complicates those relationships. Furthermore, lower biomass-specific primary productivity around submarine springs at both sites suggests that submarine springs have negative impacts on phytoplankton growth rates around vent sites, possibly due to changes in local environmental conditions. Our study clarified that the mechanism by which SGD affects phytoplankton production differs from one ecosystem to another because of variable hydrogeographical properties, such as the type of groundwater discharge (i.e. spring or seepage).


KEY WORDS: In situ primary productivity · Submarine groundwater discharge · 222Rn


Full text in pdf format  
Cite this article as: Sugimoto R, Kitagawa K, Nishi S, Honda H and others (2017) Phytoplankton primary productivity around submarine groundwater discharge in nearshore coasts. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 563:25-33. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11980

Export citation
Mail this link - Contents Mailing Lists - RSS
- -