MEPS 585:113-121 (2017)  -  DOI:

Baited Remote Underwater Video surveys undercount sharks at high densities: insights from full-spherical camera technologies

James P. Kilfoil1,*, Aaron J. Wirsing2, Matthew D. Campbell3, Jeremy J. Kiszka1, Kirk R. Gastrich1, Michael R. Heithaus1, Yuying Zhang1, Mark E. Bond1

1Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, North Miami, FL 33181, USA
2School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
3National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Mississippi Laboratories, Pascagoula, MS 39567, USA
*Corresponding author:

ABSTRACT: Video surveys are an essential tool for monitoring marine communities. Their use to study elasmobranch populations has dramatically increased over the last decade. However, the restricted field-of-view (FOV) of traditional cameras in these surveys may bias abundance estimates in a number of ways, including saturation at high densities and low detection probability for rare or cryptic species. This study investigated these potential biases using newly developed full-spherical (FS) camera technology. A comparison of 35 Baited Remote Underwater Video surveys (BRUVs), using both FS and traditional cameras, was conducted from July to August 2016 in shallow waters (0.4 to 8.5 m) of Tetiaroa, French Polynesia. Both blacktip reef Carcharhinus melanopterus and sicklefin lemon sharks Negaprion acutidens were quantified from traditional cameras using MaxN and MeanCount methods. These estimates were then regressed against FS cameras counts, which were assumed to more accurately represent site abundance, to test for gear saturation. Detection probabilities of the traditional and FS cameras were assessed using a Bayesian binomial model, with uninformed-uniform priors. Results indicated a significant effect of gear saturation for standard BRUVs as counts on FS cameras increased, regardless of the metric used. Furthermore, traditional cameras had a significantly lower detection probability (mean ± 2 SD: 69.88 ± 0.008%) than FS cameras (81.20 ± 0.007%). Our findings show that traditional cameras are unlikely to adequately discriminate differences in shark relative abundance at high densities. Therefore, standard BRUV techniques that use restricted FOV cameras are likely limited in their ability to provide accurate information to managers once populations have reached particular thresholds of abundance.

KEY WORDS: 360° cameras · Detectability · Elasmobranchs · Monitoring · Video surveys

Full text in pdf format
Supplementary material 
Cite this article as: Kilfoil JP, Wirsing AJ, Campbell MD, Kiszka JJ and others (2017) Baited Remote Underwater Video surveys undercount sharks at high densities: insights from full-spherical camera technologies. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 585:113-121.

Export citation
Mail this link - Contents Mailing Lists - RSS
- -