Inter-Research > MEPS > v561 > p245-260  
MEPS
Marine Ecology Progress Series

via Mailchimp

MEPS 561:245-260 (2016)  -  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11906

Prey density and depth affect the fine-scale foraging behavior of humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae in Sitka Sound, Alaska, USA

J. A. Burrows1,*, D. W. Johnston1, J. M. Straley2, E. M. Chenoweth3, C. Ware4, C. Curtice5, S. L. DeRuiter6, A. S. Friedlaender7

1Division of Marine Science and Conservation, Duke University Marine Laboratory, Beaufort, NC 28516, USA
2Department of Marine Biology, University of Alaska Southeast, Sitka, AK 99835, USA
3School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA
4Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
5Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Duke University Marine Laboratory, Beaufort, NC 28516, USA
6Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Calvin College, Grand Rapids, MI 49546, USA
7Marine Mammal Institute, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Newport, OR 97365, USA
*Corresponding author:

ABSTRACT: Humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae are filter feeders that use discrete lunges to effectively capture densely aggregated prey. The objective of this research was to examine how foraging humpback whales in Southeast Alaska responded to varying prey patch densities and depths. Digital acoustic recording tags (DTAGs; n = 6) were deployed and focal follows were conducted on foraging whales in Sitka Sound, Alaska in September 2012. Prey density was recorded around tagged whales using a Simrad EK60 scientific echosounder and ground-truthed with net tows. Lunges were identified from peaks in jerk in the accelerometer signal, and krill were identified from echosounder data using decibel differencing. Lunge depth was 111 ± 9 m (mean ±SD) for the shallowest diving whale (foraging past sunset) and 144 ± 7 (mean ±SD) m for the deepest diving whale (foraging diurnally). Ninety-five percent of lunges occurred within a 300 m and 30 min spatio-temporal buffer of krill, indicating that tagged whales fed on krill. Generalized additive mixed model (GAMM) results for spatio-temporally integrated prey and lunge data indicated that mean volume backscattering strength, a proxy for krill density, and krill depth significantly affected the occurrence of a lunge (density: p = 0.006, depth: p < 0.001). Whales fed in the densest region of the krill layer, where mean volume backscatter was -57 dB (range: -50 to -81 dB re 1 m-1 at 120 kHz). By targeting the densest prey layer, whales maximized their energetic gain by capturing the most prey with each lunge.


KEY WORDS: Humpback whale · Foraging · Behavior · Prey · Krill · Alaska


Full text in pdf format
Cite this article as: Burrows JA, Johnston DW, Straley JM, Chenoweth EM and others (2016) Prey density and depth affect the fine-scale foraging behavior of humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae in Sitka Sound, Alaska, USA. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 561:245-260. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11906

Export citation
Share:    Facebook - - linkedIn

 Previous article