AEI

Aquaculture Environment Interactions

AEI is a gold Open Access journal and a multidisciplinary forum for primary research studies on the environmental sustainability of aquaculture.

Online: ISSN 1869-7534

Print: ISSN 1869-215X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/aei

Impact Factor2.5 (JCR 2025 release)

Article Acceptance Rate25% (2024)

Average Time in Review175 days (2024)

Total Annual Downloads149.452 (2025)

Volume contents
Aquacult Environ Interact 1:215-224 (2011)

An effective method for the recapture of escaped farmed salmon

ABSTRACT: The search for effective strategies to prevent and mitigate accidental releases of aquaculture fishes is on-going. To test a new recapture strategy and evaluate the individual dispersal behaviour of escaped farmed Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. at the northern limit of its range, 39 adult salmon (mean ± SD fork length and weight: 85.5 ± 5.0 cm and 7.4 ± 1.4 kg, respectively) were implanted with depth-sensing acoustic tags and released in a north Norwegian fjord during the spring of 2007. The fish were released from 2 aquaculture sites in the Altafjord system and tracked using both mobile and fixed receivers. The coastal marine bag-net fishery, in combination with in-river angling, was tested as a potential recapture strategy. Immediately following the simulated escape event, the fish dove to near-bottom depths, subsequently returning to surface levels within the following days. The fish dispersed rapidly (9.5 ± 19.2 km d–1), traveling outward to coastal waters along the edges of the fjord. The bag-net fishers and anglers recaptured 79% of the escaped fish within 1 mo post-release, 90% of which were from bag nets. While most of the fish left the fjord, 7 tagged fish (18%) entered the Alta River estuary (3 of which later migrated up the Alta River), and 1 returned to the Altafjord the following year, presumably to spawn. The results showed that recapture efforts need to be immediate and widespread to mitigate farm-escape events. Coastal bag nets were effective at recapturing escaped farmed salmon, compared to previously tested methods, and would be especially useful in areas where gill-netting is not permitted.

KEYWORDS

Cedar M. Chittenden (Co-author)

  • Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
  • The University of British Columbia, Centre for Aquaculture and Environmental Research, 4160 Marine Drive, West Vancouver, British Columbia V7V 1N6, Canada

Audun H. Rikardsen (Co-author)

  • Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway

Ove T. Skilbrei (Co-author)

  • Institute of Marine Research, 5817 Bergen, Norway

Jan G. Davidsen (Co-author)

  • Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
  • Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway

Elina Halttunen (Co-author)

  • Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway

Jofrid Skarðhamar (Co-author)

  • Institute of Marine Research, 5817 Bergen, Norway

R. Scott McKinley (Co-author)

  • The University of British Columbia, Centre for Aquaculture and Environmental Research, 4160 Marine Drive, West Vancouver, British Columbia V7V 1N6, Canada