Inter-Research > AME > v29 > n3 > p307-312  
Aquatic Microbial Ecology

via Mailchimp

AME 29:307-312 (2002)  -  doi:10.3354/ame029307

Effects of hydrologically confined fishes on bacterioplankton and autotrophic picoplankton in a semiarid marsh

David G. Angeler1,*, María A. Rodrigo2, Salvador Sánchez-Carrillo3, Miguel Alvarez-Cobelas4

1University of Castilla-La Mancha, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Technological Campus, Avda. Carlos III s/n, 45071 Toledo, Spain
2University of Valencia, Cavanilles¹ Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Paterna, 46980 Valencia, Spain
3Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora, 5 de Febrero 818 Sur, Col. Centro, Cd. Obregón, Sonora, CP 85000, Mexico
4CSIC, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Serrano 115 dpdo, 28006 Madrid, Spain

ABSTRACT: An enclosure experiment was conducted to assess the separate effects of exotic benthivorous (Cyprinus carpio L.), planktivorous (Gambusia holbrooki Gir.), and omnivorous (Lepomis gibbosus L.) fish on the dynamics of bacterioplankton (BAC) and autotrophic picoplankton (APP) in a semiarid Spanish marsh. Special emphasis was put on simulating the effect of natural fish density situations occurring under periods of hydrological confinement in the wetland, i.e. during summer draw downs or artificial water-level reductions, when fish biomass can reach high levels. The resulting simulation of such a scenario (C. carpio, 5000 to 6000 kg ha-1; L. gibbosus, 1300 to 1700 kg ha-1, and G. holbrooki, 115 kg ha-1) revealed that C. carpio and L. gibbosus significantly increased the trophic level in the enclosures. This resulted in a significant increase of BAC in the respective treatments. G. holbrooki, on the other hand, failed to fuel BAC growth. Considering APP, composed of phycocyanin-rich picocyanobacteria Synechococcus sp., no fish treatment effects were detected, suggesting that the fishes, independent of biomasses used, were not important in driving APP. Results indicate that microbial communities respond in different ways to changes in fish biomass in fluctuating wetlands.

KEY WORDS: Bacterioplankton · Autotrophic picoplankton · Fishes · Enclosures · Wetland

Full text in pdf format