Inter-Research > CR > v25 > n3 > p243-252  
Climate Research

via Mailchimp

CR 25:243-252 (2004)  -  doi:10.3354/cr025243

Predicting phenological development in winter wheat

Qingwu Xue1,3,*, Albert Weiss1, P. Stephen Baenziger2

1School of Natural Resource Sciences and
2Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583-0728, USA
3Present address: Northwestern Agricultural Research Center, Montana State University, 4570 Montana 35, Kalispell, MT 59901

ABSTRACT: Accurate prediction of phenological development is important in the winter wheat Triticum aestivum agroecosystem. From a practical perspective, applications of pesticides and fertilizers are carried out at specific phenological stages. In crop-simulation modeling, the prediction of yield components (kernel number and kernel weight) and wheat-grain yield relies on accurate prediction of phenology. In this study, a nonlinear multiplicative model by Wang & Engel (WE) for predicting phenological development in differing winter wheat cultivars was evaluated using data from a 3 yr field experiment. In the vegetative phase (emergence to anthesis) the daily development rate (r) was simulated based on the product of a maximum development rate (Rmax) in the vegetative phase, a temperature response function [ƒ (T)], a photoperiod response function [f (P)], and a vernalization response function [ƒ(V)]. ƒ(T) was a nonlinear the 3 cardinal temperatures for phenological development (minimum, Tmin, optimum, Topt, and maximum, Tmax). ƒ(P) was an exponential function of the actual and critical photoperiods and a sensitivity parameter unique to each cultivar. ƒ(V) was calculated using ƒ(T) based on the cardinal temperatures for vernalization (Tmin,vn, Topt,vn, and Tmax,vn). In the reproductive phase, r was simulated based on the product of Rmax for the reproductive phase and ƒ(T). Predictions from this nonlinear model were compared to predictions from the phenology submodel of CERES-Wheat V3.0 (CW3). The nonlinear model performed very well for predicting phenological development in the 3 winter wheat cultivars, the mean root mean square error (RMSE) ranged from 2.9 to 4.1 d from booting to maturity. For the CW3 model, the mean RMSE ranged from 4.8 to 5.9 d for the same phenological stages. The WE model predicted double ridge with a mean RMSE of 7.3 d. Both models predicted terminal spikelet with a mean RMSE ranging from 6.2 to 7.1 d. The WE model was generally a better predictor of phenology between booting and maturity than the CW3 model.

KEY WORDS: Phenology · Temperature · Photoperiod · Vernalization · Modeling · Triticum aestivum L.

Full text in pdf format