Inter-Research > CR > v30 > n3 > p227-237  
Climate Research

via Mailchimp

CR 30:227-237 (2006)  -  doi:10.3354/cr030227

Comparative analysis of albedo and surface energy balance of a grassland site and an adjacent Scots pine forest

Jutta Rost*, Helmut Mayer

Meteorological Institute, University of Freiburg, Werderring 10, 79085 Freiburg, Germany

ABSTRACT: The climate conditions in the atmospheric boundary layer are influenced by the underlying land-use type because of its impacts on surface energy balance. Furthermore, the performance of atmospheric models depends crucially on a realistic representation of surface processes, e.g. the partitioning of available energy into individual energy-balance components. The present study investigates the similarities and differences in the energy balance of grassland and forest. Data from the period March 1992 to September 1996 were gathered at 2 adjacent sites in the southern Upper Rhine Plain in southwest Germany: a Scots pine Pinus sylvestris L. forest site at Hartheim, and an adjacent grassland site at Bremgarten. The experimental sites constituted a segment of the REKLIP (Regio-Klima-Projekt) network of energy-balance stations. Synoptic conditions were very similar for both land-use types owing to the short distance between the 2 sites. Differences in available energy (AE) between both land-use types were mainly caused by their different albedo. On average, AE of the Scots pine forest was higher than that for grassland by 24%. Normalised by AE, the mean sensible heat flux H accounted for 38% of the AE for grassland and 47% of the AE for the Scots pine forest, while the mean latent heat flux LE reached 62% for grassland and only 53% for the Scots pine forest. Compared to the mean Bowen ratio β of 0.61 for grassland, the relatively high mean β value of 0.89 for the Scots pine forest resulted from the strong stomatal control of the pine trees due to the warm and dry site conditions. In the case of a sufficient water supply, forest AE was converted in equal proportions to LE and H, while for grassland, 60 and 40% of AE were converted to LE and H, respectively. With a low water supply, more AE was converted into H for both land-use types.

KEY WORDS: Energy balance · Land-use types · Grassland · Forest · Pinus sylvestris

Full text in pdf format
 Previous article Next article