Inter-Research > MEPS > v228 > p241-261  
Marine Ecology Progress Series

via Mailchimp

MEPS 228:241-261 (2002)  -  doi:10.3354/meps228241

Remote-sensing systems and seabirds: their use, abuse and potential for measuring marine environmental variables

Rory P. Wilson1,*, David Grémillet1,6, Jon Syder2, Mandy A. M. Kierspel1, Stefan Garthe1, Henri Weimerskirch3, Christian Schäfer-Neth4, J. Alejandro Scolaro5, Charles-André Bost6, Joachim Plötz7, Deon Nel8

1Institut für Meereskunde, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany
2Hydrology Program, Department of Land, Air and Water resources, University of California, Davis, California 95616-8628, USA
3Centre d¹Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 79360 Beauvoir/Niort, France
4Universität Bremen, FB2‹Meereschemie, Postfach 330440, 28334 Bremen, Germany
5Centro Patagonico, Boulevard Brown s/n, Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina
6Centre d¹Ecologie et Physiologie Energétiques, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 23 rue Becquerel, 67087 Strasbourg, France
7Alfred Wegener Institut, Columbusstraße, 27568 Bremerhaven, Germany
8FitzPatrick Institute, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7700, South Africa

ABSTRACT: We examined how seabirds might be used to study marine environmental variables, which necessitates knowing location and the value of the variable to be studied. Five systems can potentially be used for determination of location: VHF (Very High Frequency) telemetry, PTT (Platform Terminal Transmitters) telemetry, GLS (Global Location Service) geolocation methods, dead reckoning and GPS (Global Positioning System), each with its own advantages with respect to accuracy, potential number of fixes and size. Temperature and light were used to illustrate potential difficulties in recording environmental variables. Systems currently used on seabirds for measurement of temperature respond slowly to environmental changes; thus, they may not measure sea surface temperature adequately when contact periods with water bodies are too short. Light can be easily measured for light extinction studies, but sensor orientation plays a large role in determining recorded values. Both problems can be corrected. The foraging behaviour of seabirds was also examined in order to identify those features which would be useful for determination of marine environmental variables at a variety of spatial and temporal scales. Area coverage by birds is highly dependent on breeding phase and tends to be concentrated in areas where prey acquisition is particularly enhanced. The identification of these sites may be of particular interest to marine biologists. 'Plungers' and 'divers' are potentially most useful for assessment of variables deeper within the water column, with some divers spending up to 90% of their time sub-surface. Few seabirds exploit the water column deeper than 20 m, although some divers regularly exceed 50 m (primarily penguins and auks), while 2 species dive in excess of 300 m. The wide-ranging behaviour of seabirds coupled, in many instances, with their substantial body size makes them potentially excellent carriers of sophisticated environmental measuring technology; however, the ethical question of how much the well-being of birds can, and should, be compromised by such an approach needs to be carefully considered.

KEY WORDS: Seabirds · Monitoring · Oceanographic variables · SST · Light extinction

Full text in pdf format
 Previous article Next article