DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps256111
copiedFecundity-time models of reproductive strategies in marine benthic invertebrates: fitness differences under fluctuating environmental conditions
ABSTRACT: Fecundity-time models have been widely used to analyze the evolution of larval strategies in marine benthic invertebrates. To further explore the behavior of this influential class of models, we examined the effect of fluctuating foodavailability on the expected duration of the planktonic larval period and the number of offspring that survive to metamorphosis in marine invertebrates with planktotrophic larvae. Food concentrations were allowed to fluctuate randomly on a daily basisbetween specified upper and lower bounds. Variation in food levels generally had a much stronger effect on development time and reproductive success when the level of egg provisioning was low (small-egg strategies). When food was abundant, smaller eggswere favored. Fluctuations in planktonic food concentrations affected small-egg strategies more strongly than large-egg strategies, but the variation in fitness was small relative to fitness differences across egg sizes. There should be consistentlystrong directional selection to minimize egg size whenever food is abundant, even if the concentrations fluctuate widely. However, when larvae were strongly food-limited, larger eggs were favored and fluctuations in planktonic food supply led to variationin fitness that was large relative to fitness differences among strategies. There was no clear peak on the fitness curve, due to overlap of fitness distributions across reproductive strategies. This leads to the prediction that there should be a range ofintermediate- to large-egg strategies, rather than a single optimal egg size. With facultative feeding by planktotrophic larvae, there were intermediate egg sizes above which variation in food level had only negligible effects on development andsurvival. When the magnitude of environmentally caused variation in reproductive success exceeds the fitness differences among reproductive strategies, this should flatten out the adaptive landscape, reduce the intensity of disruptive or directionalselection, and facilitate evolutionary transitions between planktotrophy and lecithotrophy or vice versa.
KEYWORDS
Larry R. McEdward (Co-author)
Benjamin G. Miner (Corresponding Author)
miner@zoology.ufl.edu
