Inter-Research > MEPS > v280 > p189-198  
Marine Ecology Progress Series

via Mailchimp

MEPS 280:189-198 (2004)  -  doi:10.3354/meps280189

Bioeconomics of foraging route selection by limpets

Giacomo Santini1,*, Michael T. Burrows2, Guido Chelazzi1

1Dipartimento di Biologia Animale e Genetica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Via Romana 17, 50125 Florence, Italy
2Scottish Association for Marine Science, Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory, Oban, Argyll PA37 1QA, UK

ABSTRACT: Homing limpets are central place foragers whose activity is constrained to restricted diel and tidal phases. The limpets¹ slow motion and high energy requirements render the problem of early choice of suitable foraging sites a critical issue. Mucous trails could be used, however, to relocate previously visited foraging areas. In this paper we describe a simulation model comparing 3 possible patch-choice tactics. These are random choice (RC) and 2 strategies (MVK and MVU) based on a marginal-value rule. The MVK strategy assumes that the forager is able to perceive and keep track of changes in energy return from successive visits to the same patch, while the MVU does not. The average long-term energy gain provided by the 3 strategies was calculated under a set of external factors: variability in the distance of patches from the central place, average value and variability in standing crop and predictability of rewards from the same foraging site when visited over successive times (autocorrelation). In the absence of variability in food sources, the different tactics yielded comparable energy returns, irrespective of average standing crop level, distance from home and autocorrelation in rewards. As variability in food sources increased, the final energy gain provided by MVK and MVU strategies changed according to the degree of autocorrelation. The MVK strategy performed increasingly better than RC for increasing autocorrelation values. The MVU strategy performed better than RC when energy returns from successive visits were positively correlated. On the contrary, in the case of a negative correlation the RC strategy was better than the MVU one.

KEY WORDS: Intertidal molluscs · Limpets · Optimal foraging · Central place

Full text in pdf format
 Previous article Next article