MEPS

Marine Ecology Progress Series

MEPS is a leading hybrid research journal on all aspects of marine, coastal and estuarine ecology. Priority is given to outstanding research that advances our ecological understanding.

Online: ISSN 1616-1599

Print: ISSN 0171-8630

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps

Impact Factor2.1 (JCR 2025 release)

Article Acceptance Rate52.2% (2024)

Average Time in Review216 days (2024)

Total Annual Downloads2.846.608 (2025)

Volume contents
Mar Ecol Prog Ser 419:11-29 (2010)

Succession and fate of the spring diatom bloom in Disko Bay, western Greenland

ABSTRACT: Phytoplankton and copepod succession was investigated in Disko Bay, western Greenland from February to July 2008. The spring phytoplankton bloom developed immediately after the breakup of sea ice and reached a peak concentration of 24 mg chl a m–3 2 wk later. The bloom was analyzed during 3 phases: the developing, the decaying, and the post-bloom phases. Grazing impact by the copepod community was assessed by 4 methods; gut fluorescence, in situ faecal pellet production, and egg and faecal pellet production from bottle incubations. Calanus spp. dominated the mesozooplankton community. They were present from the initiation of the bloom but only had a small grazing impact on the phytoplankton. Consequently, there was a close coupling between the spring phytoplankton bloom and sedimentation of particulate organic carbon (POC). Out of 1836 ± 180 mg C m–2 d–1 leaving the upper 50 m, 60% was phytoplankton based carbon (PPC). The composition and quality of the sedimenting material changed throughout the bloom succession from PPC dominance in the initial phase with a POC/PON ratio close to 6.6 to a dominance of amorphous detritus with a higher POC/PON ratio (>10) in the post-bloom phase. The succession and fate of the phytoplankton spring bloom was controlled by nitrogen limitation and subsequent sedimentation, while grazing-mediated flux by the Calanus-dominated copepod community played a minor role in the termination of the spring bloom of Disko Bay.

KEYWORDS

Michael Dünweber (Co-author)

  • National Environmental Research Institute, Department of Marine Ecology, University of Aarhus, Frederiksborgvej 399,
  • Section for Oceanecology and Climate, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Kavalergården 6, 2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark

Rasmus Swalethorp (Co-author)

  • National Environmental Research Institute, Department of Marine Ecology, University of Aarhus, Frederiksborgvej 399,
  • Section for Oceanecology and Climate, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Kavalergården 6, 2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark

Sanne Kjellerup (Co-author)

  • National Environmental Research Institute, Department of Marine Ecology, University of Aarhus, Frederiksborgvej 399,
  • Section for Oceanecology and Climate, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Kavalergården 6, 2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark

T. G. Nielsen (Corresponding Author)

  • National Environmental Research Institute, Department of Marine Ecology, University of Aarhus, Frederiksborgvej 399,
  • Section for Oceanecology and Climate, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Kavalergården 6, 2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark
tgin@aqua.dtu.dk

Kristine Engel Arendt (Co-author)

  • Greenland Climate Research Centre, Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, Kivioq 3, Po Box 570, 3900 Nuuk, Greenland

Morten Hjorth (Co-author)

  • National Environmental Research Institute, Department of Marine Ecology, University of Aarhus, Frederiksborgvej 399,

Kajsa Tönnesson (Co-author)

  • Department of Marine Ecology—Göteborg, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden

Eva Friis Møller (Co-author)

  • National Environmental Research Institute, Department of Marine Ecology, University of Aarhus, Frederiksborgvej 399,