MEPS

Marine Ecology Progress Series

MEPS is a leading hybrid research journal on all aspects of marine, coastal and estuarine ecology. Priority is given to outstanding research that advances our ecological understanding.

Online: ISSN 1616-1599

Print: ISSN 0171-8630

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps

Impact Factor2.1 (JCR 2025 release)

Article Acceptance Rate52.2% (2024)

Average Time in Review216 days (2024)

Total Annual Downloads2.946.427 (2025)

Volume contents
Mar Ecol Prog Ser 505:193-208 (2014)

Orientation of fish larvae in situ is consistent among locations, years and methods, but varies with time of day

ABSTRACT: Understanding larval dispersal requires knowledge of whether larvae in situ have orientated swimming, and how this varies temporally and spatially. Orientation of >300 settlement-stage larvae of Chromis atripectoralis (Pomacentridae) measured over 1998-2008 by divers near Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef was consistent. All 10 data sets had southerly orientation at all locations; 94% of larvae swam directionally. Median bearings east and west of Lizard Island were 166° and 170°, respectively. Orientation precision was significantly higher under sunny than cloudy skies. Similar mean bearings were obtained in 2008 with more than 125 larvae observed in a drifting in situ chamber (DISC). Orientation varied with time of day. In sunny conditions, precision was weakly, significantly correlated with time of day, but not solar elevation; however, a greater proportion of larvae was significantly directional at low (<50°) than at high (>50°) solar elevation. Mean bearing and time of day were weakly, but significantly correlated. Bearings changed from SE during most of the day to SSW in the late afternoon, with distribution of bearings significantly different. Location-independent but diurnally-dependent orientation implies that larvae used celestial cues for orientation. Of 91 Pomacentrus lepidogenys larvae that were followed by divers, 89% swam directionally, but orientation differed among locations and years. DISC results with 20 larvae were similar. The similarity of orientation returned by different methods used on 2 fish species corroborates previous results using diver following. Both methods are useful for the study of larval-fish orientation in situ: each has advantages and limitations, and their use is complementary.

KEYWORDS

Jeffrey M. Leis (Corresponding Author)

  • Ichthyology, Australian Museum, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia
  • Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Tasmania 7000, Australia
jeff.leis@austmus.gov.au

Claire B. Paris (Co-author)

  • Division of Applied Marine Physics, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, Florida 33149–1098, USA

Jean-Olivier Irisson (Co-author)

  • Division of Applied Marine Physics, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, Florida 33149–1098, USA

Michelle N. Yerman (Co-author)

  • Ichthyology, Australian Museum, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia

Ulrike E. Siebeck (Co-author)

  • School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia