Inter-Research > MEPS > v517 > p61-74  
Marine Ecology Progress Series

via Mailchimp

MEPS 517:61-74 (2014)  -  DOI:

Mechanisms of prey size selection in a suspension-feeding copepod, Temora longicornis

Rodrigo J. Gonçalves1,2,3,*, Hans van Someren Gréve1, Damien Couespel1, Thomas Kiørboe1

1Centre for Ocean Life, DTU Aqua, Technical University of Denmark, Kavalergården 6, 2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark
2Estación de Fotobiología Playa Unión, Casilla de Correos N° 15 (9103) Rawson, Chubut, Argentina
3Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Av. Rivadavia 1917, Caba, Argentina
*Corresponding author:

ABSTRACT: We examined size-dependent prey detection and prey capture in free-swimming Temora longicornis using video observations, particle image velocimetry (PIV), and bottle incubations with phytoplankton prey sizes within the range 6-60 µm equivalent spherical diameter (ESD). T. longicornis generates feeding currents by oscillating its appendages at about 25 Hz. Prey cells >10 µm ESD are perceived and captured individually. A capture response was elicited when prey was touched by (or within a few cell radii from) the setae on the feeding appendages. The extension of the setae defines the prey encounter cross section, which is therefore independent of prey size. The flux of water through the encounter area, estimated from PIV, was ca. 150 ml ind.-1 d-1, which represents the maximum possible clearance rates and was similar to that estimated in incubation experiments. However, while the detection probability was nearly 100% for cells >10-15 µm, it declined rapidly for smaller cells. Conversely, the probability that a cell which elicited a capture response was actually ingested declined with increased cell size, from nearly 100% for small cells, to ~0% for the largest cells examined. The resulting prey size spectrum, predicted as the product of the cell-size-specific encounter rates and capture probabilities, was dome-shaped, with a maximum around 20-30 µm ESD. The prey size spectrum from incubation experiments had a similar shape and an optimum range of 30-50 µm ESD. The mechanistic underpinning of the prey size spectrum suggested here deviates from previous descriptions mainly in the mechanism and range of prey detection.

KEY WORDS: Temora longicornis · Calanoid copepods · Prey detection · Feeding currents · Prey capture · Zooplankton · Size spectrum · Prey size

Full text in pdf format
Supplementary material
Cite this article as: Gonçalves RJ, van Someren Gréve H, Couespel D, Kiørboe T (2014) Mechanisms of prey size selection in a suspension-feeding copepod, Temora longicornis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 517:61-74.

Export citation
Share:    Facebook - - linkedIn

 Previous article Next article