MEPS

Marine Ecology Progress Series

MEPS is a leading hybrid research journal on all aspects of marine, coastal and estuarine ecology. Priority is given to outstanding research that advances our ecological understanding.

Online: ISSN 1616-1599

Print: ISSN 0171-8630

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps

Impact Factor2.1 (JCR 2025 release)

Article Acceptance Rate52.2% (2024)

Average Time in Review216 days (2024)

Total Annual Downloads2.960.562 (2025)

Volume contents
Mar Ecol Prog Ser 562:181-192 (2016)

Assessing the utility of two- and three-dimensional behavioural metrics in habitat usage models

ABSTRACT: For deep-diving, wide-ranging marine predators, foraging behaviour is often inferred from movement data. Various metrics are used to do this, and recently, metrics have been developed that consider both horizontal movement and vertical dive behaviour to better describe the use of the 3-dimensional environment these animals inhabit. However, the efficacy of these different metrics in predicting behavioural state is poorly understood. We used first passage time (2-dimensional) and first bottom time (3-dimensional) analyses on tracks derived from satellite-relayed data loggers to quantify and determine seal behavioural state while foraging at sea. Movement and dive data were collected from 38 southern elephant seals Mirounga leonina from Macquarie and Campbell Islands (in the Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean). Using a suite of environmental variables, linear mixed-effect models were derived for the 2 broad habitats visited by the seals: shelf and open ocean. The best-fitting models for each foraging metric in each habitat were then compared using a cross validation analysis to identify which foraging metric produced the best predictions of habitat use. In shelf habitats, the 3-dimensional foraging metric provided better predictions than the 2-dimensional metric, while the 2-dimensional foraging metric resulted in the best predictive capacity in the open ocean habitats. These findings highlight the importance of considering the appropriate foraging metrics when modelling foraging behaviour.

KEYWORDS

Penelope Pascoe (Corresponding Author)

  • Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Battery Point 7004, Australia
pennypascoe@gmail.com

Mary-Anne Lea (Co-author)

  • Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Battery Point 7004, Australia
  • Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems CRC, Level 3, Tasmania 7004, Australia

Rob H. Mattlin (Co-author)

  • Marine Wildlife Research, Nelson 7050, New Zealand

Clive R. McMahon (Co-author)

  • Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Battery Point 7004, Australia
  • Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, NSW 2088, Australia

Robert Harcourt (Co-author)

  • Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia

David Thompson (Co-author)

  • National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington 6021, New Zealand

Leigh Torres (Co-author)

  • Hatfield Marine Science Center, Marine Mammal Institute, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Newport, OR 97365, USA

Kimberly Vinette-Herrin (Co-author)

  • Taronga Conservation Society, Mosman, NSW 2088, Australia

Mark A. Hindell (Co-author)

  • Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Battery Point 7004, Australia
  • Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems CRC, Level 3, Tasmania 7004, Australia