Inter-Research > MEPS > v568 > p101-110  
Marine Ecology Progress Series

via Mailchimp

MEPS 568:101-110 (2017)  -  DOI:

Nematocyst distribution corresponds to prey capture location in hydromedusae with different predation modes

Marco Corrales-Ugalde1,*, Sean P. Colin2,3, Kelly R. Sutherland1

1Oregon Institute of Marine Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403, USA
2Department of Marine Biology and Environmental Science, Roger Williams University, Bristol, Rhode Island 02809, USA
3Whitman Center, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA
*Corresponding author:

ABSTRACT: Understanding the factors that control predation in pelagic communities can inform predictions of community structure in marine ecosystems. Ubiquitous and selective predators such as cnidarian hydromedusae rely on their nematocysts to capture and retain prey but it is not clear how the density and spatial distribution of these cells relate to predation mode. We examined the relationship between prey capture and nematocyst distribution in the tentacles of Aglantha digitale and Proboscidactyla flavicirrata, which are considered ambush predators, and Clytia gregaria and Mitrocoma cellularia, which are considered feeding-current predators. First, we analyzed video of predator-prey interactions to compare capture locations of Artemia nauplii relative to the bell margin of each species. Second, tentacles of the same 4 species plus Sarsia tubulosa and Aequorea victoria were analyzed using microscopy to determine nematocyst distribution along their lengths. By analyzing behavior and morphology simultaneously, we found that the ambush predators A. digitale and P. flavicirrata have higher nematocyst density far from the bell and tend to capture more prey in the same region. In contrast, the feeding-current predators C. gregaria and M. cellularia capture most of their prey close to the bell, where they also show a slight increase in nematocyst densities. The presence of high nematocyst densities in regions where prey are likely to contact feeding structures serves to increase capture efficiencies. Quantifying the relationship between prey capture and nematocyst locations for different foraging strategies will strengthen the ability of researchers to predict feeding behavior based on morphological features.

KEY WORDS: Feeding behavior · Functional morphology · Predation · Zooplankton · Aequorea victoria · Aglantha digitale · Clytia gregaria · Mitrocoma cellularia · Proboscidactyla flavicirrata · Sarsia tubulosa

Full text in pdf format
Cite this article as: Corrales-Ugalde M, Colin SP, Sutherland KR (2017) Nematocyst distribution corresponds to prey capture location in hydromedusae with different predation modes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 568:101-110.

Export citation
Share:    Facebook - - linkedIn

 Previous article Next article