MEPS

Marine Ecology Progress Series

MEPS is a leading hybrid research journal on all aspects of marine, coastal and estuarine ecology. Priority is given to outstanding research that advances our ecological understanding.

Online: ISSN 1616-1599

Print: ISSN 0171-8630

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps

Impact Factor2.1 (JCR 2025 release)

Article Acceptance Rate52.2% (2024)

Average Time in Review216 days (2024)

Total Annual Downloads2.981.766 (2025)

Volume contents
Mar Ecol Prog Ser 594:245-261 (2018)

Selective occupancy of a persistent yet variable coastal river plume by two seabird species

ABSTRACT: Advances in telemetry and modeling of physical processes expand opportunities to assess relationships between marine predators and their dynamic habitat. The Columbia River plume (CRP) attracts sooty shearwaters Ardenna grisea and common murres Uria aalge, but how seabirds respond to variability in plume waters is unknown. We characterized seabird distributions in relation to hourly, daily, monthly, and seasonal variation in CRP location and surface area by attaching satellite telemetry tags to shearwaters in 2008 and 2009, and to murres in 2012 and 2013. We matched seabird locations to surface salinity from a high-resolution hydrodynamic model of the CRP and adjacent waters. Utilization distributions indicated high-use areas north of the Columbia River mouth and in continental shelf waters. Shearwater and murre occupancy of tidal (<21 psu), recirculating (21-26 psu), and boundary (26-31 psu) plume waters was on average 31% greater than expected and positively correlated with CRP surface area. Seabird latitude was positively correlated with latitude of the geographic center of the CRP, indicating that birds move in phase with the plume. We detected a threshold response of seabirds to plume size, and birds were closer to the convergent CRP boundary (28 psu isohaline) after a surface area threshold between 1500 and 4000 km2 was exceeded. We conclude that shearwaters and murres selectively occupy and track plume waters, particularly dynamic boundary waters where foraging opportunities may be enhanced by increases in surface area and associated biophysical coupling that aggregates zooplankton and attracts prey fishes.

KEYWORDS

Elizabeth M. Phillips (Corresponding Author)

  • University of Washington, School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
emp11@uw.edu

John K. Horne (Co-author)

  • University of Washington, School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

Josh Adams (Co-author)

  • US Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Santa Cruz Field Station, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA

Jeannette E. Zamon (Co-author)

  • NOAA Fisheries, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Pt. Adams Research Station, Hammond, OR 97121, USA