MEPS

Marine Ecology Progress Series

MEPS is a leading hybrid research journal on all aspects of marine, coastal and estuarine ecology. Priority is given to outstanding research that advances our ecological understanding.

Online: ISSN 1616-1599

Print: ISSN 0171-8630

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps

Impact Factor2.1 (JCR 2025 release)

Article Acceptance Rate52.2% (2024)

Average Time in Review216 days (2024)

Total Annual Downloads2.901.285 (2025)

Volume contents
Mar Ecol Prog Ser 596:71-81 (2018)

Epifaunal community structure within southern New Zealand kelp forests

ABSTRACT: Epifaunal communities associated with macroalgal forests are a key link in coastal food webs, yet they are relatively poorly understood in terms of diversity, structure and regional variability. We quantified the biomass, density and richness of epifauna on the 7 most dominant seaweed species from 2 regions of southern New Zealand, i.e. East Otago and Stewart Island. We analysed the epifaunal community structure associated with each macroalgal species and estimated the average biomass of epifauna supported per m2 of substrate at the shallow (2 m) and deep (10 m) extent of each reef. Significant differences in epifaunal biomass, density and richness were evident between macroalgal species in both regions, and epifaunal community structure differed significantly between regions on 2 of the 4 macroalgal species that were shared. Epifaunal biomass ranged between 5.1 and 186.8 g wet weight m-2 and corresponded to 0.01 to 0.08% of the macroalgal biomass. Epifaunal biomass and density were not always linked to the morphological complexity of the host macroalgal species, and some of the highest values were found on species considered morphologically simple, such as the fucoid Xiphophora gladiata and laminarian kelp Ecklonia radiata. Greater macroalgal biomass at shallow depths did not always result in greater epifaunal biomass when compared to deeper depths, indicating that macroalgal community structure plays a significant role in controlling epifaunal biomass. Significant regional and host-specific factors likely influence epifaunal communities, and these should be considered when estimating secondary productivity and the effects of habitat change.

KEYWORDS

Matthew J. Desmond (Corresponding Author)

  • Department of Marine Science, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
matthew.desmond@otago.ac.nz

Rocío Suárez-Jiménez (Co-author)

  • Department of Marine Science, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
  • Department of Botany, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand

Wendy A. Nelson (Co-author)

  • National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington 6021, New Zealand
  • School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand

Christopher D. Hepburn (Co-author)

  • Department of Marine Science, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand