Inter-Research > MEPS > v614 > p1-19  
MEPS
Marine Ecology Progress Series

via Mailchimp

MEPS 614:1-19 (2019)  -  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12900

FEATURE ARTICLE
Physiological response to temperature, light, and nitrates in the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera from Tasmania, Australia

Christopher J. T. Mabin1,*, Craig R. Johnson2, Jeffrey T. Wright2

1Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia
2Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia
*Corresponding author:

ABSTRACT: Climate change is characterised by multiple abiotic forcings acting simultaneously on biotic systems. In marine systems, temperature appears to drive much of the observed change in biotic communities subject to climate change, but this may reflect the focus of most studies only on temperature without consideration of other environmental variables affected by climate change. The giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera was once abundant in eastern Tasmania, forming extensive habitats of ecological and economic importance, but recent extensive population decline has occurred. Southerly incursion of warm oligotrophic East Australian Current (EAC) water has increased in frequency and intensity into this region, which has warmed ~4 times the global average, and the warming trend is predicted to continue. This study investigated the single and combined effects of temperature, light, and nitrate availability on the physiology of juvenile M. pyrifera sporophytes in a laboratory experiment. Determination of relative growth rate, photosystem II characteristics, pigments, elemental chemistry, and nucleic acid characteristics over 28 d showed that all experimental factors affected sporeling physiology. Temperature and light drove much of the observed variation related to performance characteristics, and rapid deterioration of kelp tissue was a consequence of temperature stress (high temperature), photoinhibition (high light), and low light, accompanied by impaired photosynthetic efficiency and increased RNA concentration, presumably associated with production of photoprotective proteins. Surprisingly, higher relative growth rates were observed in low-nitrate treatments. These findings suggest that negative effects of temperature on M. pyrifera populations will be mediated by local variation in light and nutrient conditions.


KEY WORDS: Kelp · Climate change · Macrocystis pyrifera · Relative growth · Photosynthesis · Physiology · Morphology


Full text in pdf format
Information about this Feature Article
Cite this article as: Mabin CJT, Johnson CR, Wright JT (2019) Physiological response to temperature, light, and nitrates in the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera from Tasmania, Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 614:1-19. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12900

Export citation
Share:    Facebook - - linkedIn

Next article