Inter-Research > MEPS > v663 > p115-125  
MEPS
Marine Ecology Progress Series

via Mailchimp

MEPS 663:115-125 (2021)  -  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13621

Biological correlates of sea urchin recruitment in kelp forest and urchin barren habitats

B. Weitzman1,2,3,*, B. Konar2

1US Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, Anchorage, AK 99508, USA
2University of Alaska Fairbanks, College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, Fairbanks, AK 99709, USA
3Present address: NOAA, National Ocean Service, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Homer, AK 99603, USA
*Corresponding author:

ABSTRACT: Shifts between the alternate stable states of sea urchin barren grounds and kelp forests correspond to sea urchin density. In the Aleutian Archipelago, green sea urchins Strongylocentrotus polyacanthus are the dominant herbivores that graze kelp forests. Sea urchin recruitment is an important driver that influences sea urchin density, particularly in the absence of top-down control from a keystone predator such as the sea otter Enhydra lutris. To understand how the biological community may influence patterns of sea urchin recruitment, we compared sea urchin recruit (size ≤20 mm) densities with biomass of other benthic organisms in both barren ground and kelp forest habitats at 9 islands across the Aleutian Archipelago. Patterns of biological community structure between the 2 habitats did not explain patterns of sea urchin recruits; however, the same 10 specific taxa were found to correlate with sea urchin recruits in each habitat. Taxa that showed strong positive correlations included Codium, Constantinea, Schizymenia, and hydrozoans, while strong negative correlations were observed with Pachyarthron and Pugettia. Weak positive correlations were observed with Alcyonidium and ascidiaceans in both habitats, while weak variable relationships were detected with Polysiphonia and Corallina between habitats. The observed species-specific relationships may be due to small sea urchin displacement by larger conspecifics, larval responses to settlement cues, post-settlement survival via biogenic refugia, or potentially predation. These potential species-specific interactions were apparent, regardless of habitat, and it can be inferred that they would be preserved in the presence or absence of keystone predation.


KEY WORDS: Kelp forest · Nearshore habitats · Recruitment · Species interaction · Urchin barrens


Full text in pdf format 
Cite this article as: Weitzman B, Konar B (2021) Biological correlates of sea urchin recruitment in kelp forest and urchin barren habitats. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 663:115-125. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13621

Export citation
Mail this link - Contents Mailing Lists - RSS
Facebook - - linkedIn