Inter-Research > MEPS > v678 > p197-209  
MEPS
Marine Ecology Progress Series

via Mailchimp

MEPS 678:197-209 (2021)  -  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13898

Better together: analysis of integrated acoustic and visual methods when surveying a cetacean community

L. Dalpaz1,2, A. D. Paro3, F. G. Daura-Jorge1,2, M. Rossi-Santos4, T. F. Norris5,†, S. N. Ingram6, L. L. Wedekin7,*

1Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia, Departamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88040-970, Brazil
2Laboratório de Mamíferos Aquáticos, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Campus Universitário, Florianópolis, 88040-970, Brazil
3Marine Biotechnology Program, Instituto de Estudos do Mar Almirante Paulo Moreira, Arraial do Cabo, RJ, 28930-000, Brazil
4Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Ambientais e Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia, 44380-000, Brazil
5Bio-waves Inc. 1106 2nd Street, #119, Encinitas, CA 92024, USA
6School of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK
7Socioambiental Consultores Associados, Florianópolis, 88015-200, Brazil
*Corresponding author:
Deceased September 9, 2020

ABSTRACT: Understanding the relative performance of data collection methods is critical for the production of robust results in any biological field study. This is particularly relevant for monitoring studies of rare and inconspicuous species, such as some cetaceans. Here, we compared how passive acoustic and visual survey methods performed when surveying a multispecies cetacean community in a large-scale survey area and whether the simultaneous application of these methods leads to complementary results. For both methods we compared (1) frequency of unscheduled survey stoppages, (2) detection ranges, (3) success in identifying species, (4) precedence of either method in synchronous detections, (5) detection rates, and (6) influence of sea state on detection rates. Data were collected during 4 surveys conducted between 2015 and 2017, using simultaneous visual and acoustic methods in the Santos Basin, Brazil. A total of 1492 h of simultaneous sampling yielded 617 detections, of which 46.5% (n = 287) were exclusively acoustic, 18.5% (n = 114) were exclusively visual, and 35% (n = 216) were corresponding detections of the same group made by each method, resulting in 108 paired detections. The simultaneous application of visual and acoustic methods was complementary. Acoustics were more efficient in detecting cetaceans—detecting first and further from the vessel and with a greater detection rate—whereas visual observation was more accurate for species identification. When used together, detection rates per species increased, reducing potential biases. By improving acoustic classification through visually confirmed sightings, this integrated approach has the potential to provide a reliable sound library for cetaceans in the Southwest Atlantic Ocean.


KEY WORDS: Comparison · Bioacoustics · Detection rate · Line transect · Marine mammal · Passive acoustic monitoring · South Atlantic Ocean


Full text in pdf format
Supplementary material 
Cite this article as: Dalpaz L, Paro AD, Daura-Jorge FG, Rossi-Santos M, Norris TF, Ingram SN, Wedekin LL (2021) Better together: analysis of integrated acoustic and visual methods when surveying a cetacean community. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 678:197-209. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13898

Export citation
Mail this link - Contents Mailing Lists - RSS
Facebook - - linkedIn