Inter-Research > MEPS > v702 > p139-152  
MEPS
Marine Ecology Progress Series

via Mailchimp

MEPS 702:139-152 (2022)  -  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps14208

Insights into the trophic ecology of white-beaked dolphins Lagenorhynchus albirostris and harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena in Iceland

Filipa I. P. Samarra1,2,*, Asunción Borrell3, Anna Selbmann4, Sverrir D. Halldórson1, Christophe Pampoulie1, Valérie Chosson1, Thorvaldur Gunnlaugsson1,#, Guðjón M. Sigurðsson1, Alex Aguilar3, Gísli A. Víkingsson1,†

1Marine and Freshwater Research Institute, 220 Hafnarfjörður, Iceland
2University of Iceland’s Institute of Research Centres, 900 Vestmannaeyjar, Iceland
3Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, and Institute of Biodiversity Research (IRBio), Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
4Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, 102 Reykjavík, Iceland
*Corresponding author:
#Retired
Deceased

ABSTRACT: Sympatric organisms can avoid competition by occupying different ecological niches, a mechanism known as niche partitioning. In Iceland, white-beaked dolphins Lagenorhynchus albirostris and harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena are the most common small cetaceans observed but their trophic ecology remains understudied, including the potential for resource competition. In this study, we measured δ15N and δ13C values from white-beaked dolphin (n = 28) and harbour porpoise (n = 29) muscle samples collected over a 33 yr period (1987-2019) to compare isotopic niche width and overlap of both species, as well as diet composition. We also tested for within-species effects of sex, age class, body length, year of sampling and origin (bycatch vs. stranding) on the δ13C and δ15N values. Intra-species variations included differences between stranded and bycaught white-beaked dolphins and ontogenetic variations in both species, but further studies are necessary to investigate the factors that might explain these results. Inter-species comparisons showed that harbour porpoises and white-beaked dolphins had non-overlapping isotopic niches, with harbour porpoises exhibiting smaller niche widths (corrected standard ellipse area, SEAc: 1.25 vs. 2.13‰2). While white-beaked dolphins had a broader diet, composed primarily of gadoids but with contributions of other fish species, harbour porpoises fed almost exclusively on capelin Mallotus villosus, suggesting niche segregation and width is largely maintained by targeting different prey resources. Both species also showed no long-term changes in trophic ecology, despite recent ecosystem changes in this region, possibly a result of adapting to spatial changes in prey distribution or shifts to other prey at similar trophic levels.


KEY WORDS: Niche partitioning · Isotopic niche · Stable isotopes · Diet composition


Full text in pdf format
Supplementary material
Cite this article as: Samarra FIP, Borrell A, Selbmann A, Halldórson SD and others (2022) Insights into the trophic ecology of white-beaked dolphins Lagenorhynchus albirostris and harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena in Iceland. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 702:139-152. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps14208

Export citation
Share:    Facebook - - linkedIn

 Previous article Next article