AB 2:105-112 (2008)  -  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/ab00040

Evaluation of passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags in studies of sea urchins: caution advised

Jean-Sébastien Lauzon-Guay1,2,*, Robert E. Scheibling1

1Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4J1, Canada
2Present address: School of Zoology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 5, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia

ABSTRACT: We evaluated the effect of passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags on feeding, growth, movement and survival of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis in field and laboratory experiments. In cages supplied with kelp, 80% of urchins (n = 74) retained their tag during an 80 d field experiment. At the end of the experiment, tagged individuals had a lower growth rate (by 42%), lower gonad index (by 23%), lower survival rate (by 30%), and took longer to right themselves (by 30%) than untagged control urchins. In a 24 h feeding experiment in the field, the consumption rate of kelp was lower for tagged urchins (by 67%) than for untagged controls. In release and recapture experiments in the field, tagged urchins moved shorter distances over 2.5 h (by 30%) than controls. Although PIT tagging had a detrimental effect on all measures of sea urchin performance, activity and survival in the field, there was no detectable effect of PIT tagging on urchin feeding rate or survival in a 10 wk laboratory experiment. Our results suggest that natural stressors, such as wave action, may limit the utility of PIT tags in field studies of urchins.


KEY WORDS: Feeding · Growth · Movement · Survival · Passive integrated transponder tags · Reproduction · Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis · Sea urchins


Full text in pdf format  
Cite this article as: Lauzon Guay JS, Scheibling RE (2008) Evaluation of passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags in studies of sea urchins: caution advised. Aquat Biol 2:105-112. https://doi.org/10.3354/ab00040

Export citation
Mail this link - Contents Mailing Lists - RSS
- -