ESR 4:267-276 (2008)  -  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00080

Improving the breeding success of a colonial seabird: a cost-benefit comparison of the eradication and control of its rat predator

Michel Pascal1,*, Olivier Lorvelec1, Vincent Bretagnolle3, Jean-Michel Culioli4

1INRA, Equipe Gestion des Populations Invasives, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Station SCRIBE, Campus de Beaulieu, 35 042 Rennes Cedex, France
2Centre d’Études Biologiques de Chizé, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 79 360 Beauvoir-sur-Niort, France
3Réserve Naturelle des Bouches de Bonifacio, Office de l’Environnement de la Corse, BP 507, 20 159 Rondinara, France

ABSTRACT: Breeding success of 5 Cory’s shearwater Calonectris diomedea sub-colonies of Lavezzu Island (Lavezzi Archipelago, Corsica) was checked annually for 25 consecutive years from 1979 to 2004. Between 1989 and 1994, 4 ship rat Rattus rattus controls were performed in several sub-colonies. In November 2000, rats were eradicated from Lavezzu Island and its 16 peripheral islets (85 ha) using traps then toxic baits. We compare cost (number of person-hours required in the field) and benefit (Cory’s shearwater breeding success) of control and eradication. The average breeding success doubled when rats were controlled or eradicated (0.82) compared to the situation without rat management (0.45). Moreover, the average breeding success after eradication (0.86) was significantly (11%) higher than after rat controls (0.75). Furthermore, the great variation in breeding success recorded among sub-colonies both with and without rat control declined dramatically after eradication, suggesting that rats had a major impact on breeding success. The estimated effort needed to perform eradication and checking of the permanent bait-station system during the year following eradication was 1360 person-hours. In contrast, rat control was estimated to require 240 or 1440 person-hours per year when implemented by trained and untrained staff, respectively. Within 6 yr, eradication cost is lower than control cost performed by untrained staff and confers several ecological advantages on more ecosystem components than Cory’s shearwater alone. Improved eradication tools such as hand or aerial broadcasting of toxic baits instead of the fairly labour-intensive eradication strategy we used would dramatically increase the economic advantage of eradication vs. control. Therefore, when feasible, we recommend eradication rather than control of non-native rat populations. Nevertheless, control remains a useful management tool when eradication is not practicable.


KEY WORDS: Biological invasion · Eradication · Control · Seabirds · Rattus rattus · Calonectris diomedea


Full text in pdf format  
Cite this article as: Pascal M, Lorvelec O, Bretagnolle V, Culioli JM (2008) Improving the breeding success of a colonial seabird: a cost-benefit comparison of the eradication and control of its rat predator. Endang Species Res 4:267-276. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00080

Export citation
Mail this link - Contents Mailing Lists - RSS
- -