Inter-Research > MEPS > v392 > p239-251  
MEPS
Marine Ecology Progress Series

via Mailchimp

MEPS 392:239-251 (2009)  -  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08237

Ecology of small neritic fishes in the western Gulf of Alaska. II. Consumption of krill in relation to krill standing stock and the physical environment

Matthew T. Wilson1,*, Christina M. Jump1, Andre Buchheister2

1Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, Washington 98115, USA
2Virginia Institute of Marine Science, PO Box 1346, Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062-1346, USA

ABSTRACT: Krill (Euphausiacea) is a patchily distributed taxon whose availability may limit neritic fishes in temperate oceans. In the western Gulf of Alaska, krill–fish aggregations were associated with high-flow areas over the shelf. We examined fish impacts on krill standing stocks in areas of different temperature, salinity, and net current velocity. Samples were collected during September 2000, 2001, and 2003 over a 48-site grid within a known walleye pollock nursery. Krill were a dietary staple of the dominant fishes: walleye pollock Theragra chalcogramma, capelin Mallotus villosus, and eulachon Thaleichthys pacificus, but their proportion in diets varied by predator species and predator length. Predators daily consumed ≤12% of standing stocks; thus, krill appeared to be amply available. However, the krill consumed by eulachon and large (>120 mm) walleye pollock were, on average, large compared to krill in plankton samples; therefore, standing stock sizes might have been overestimated by including small krill. A compensatory response in consumption occurred during 2001 in proximity to the Shelikof sea valley due to increased per capita predation rates and local concentration of Age-1+ walleye pollock and eulachon. High abundance of krill in 2001 was associated with high ocean current flow. No compensatory response was observed where local standing stocks were dominated by small krill. Thus, apparent bottom-up influences of ocean currents on krill abundance in neritic areas can be partly compensated by localized top-down predation from nektonic fishes having prey size preferences that match available prey sizes.


KEY WORDS: Walleye pollock · Capelin · Eulachon · Diet · Geographic variability


Full text in pdf format
Cite this article as: Wilson MT, Jump CM, Buchheister A (2009) Ecology of small neritic fishes in the western Gulf of Alaska. II. Consumption of krill in relation to krill standing stock and the physical environment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 392:239-251. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08237

Export citation
Share:    Facebook - - linkedIn

 Previous article Next article