Inter-Research > AEI > v12 > p67-80  
AEI
Aquaculture Environment Interactions

via Mailchimp

AEI 12:67-80 (2020)  -  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00348

Sea lice prevention strategies affect cleaner fish delousing efficacy in commercial Atlantic salmon sea cages

K. Gentry1,*, S. Bui2, F. Oppedal2, T. Dempster1

1Sustainable Aquaculture Laboratory - Tropical and Temperate (SALTT), School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
2Institute of Marine Research, Matre Aquaculture Research Station, 5984 Matredal, Norway
*Corresponding author:

ABSTRACT: Over the last 2 decades, cleaner fishes have been employed to remove external sea lice parasites from Atlantic salmon Salmo salar in sea cages. Norway, Scotland, Ireland, and the Faroe Islands combined now use ~60 million cleaner fish per year. While small-scale experiments demonstrate the efficacy of cleaner fishes, industrial-scale sea cages have multiple structures and conditions that create different environments, which may impact cleaner fish efficacy and welfare. Here, in commercial sea cages, we investigated if 4 different anti-lice strategies impacted the delousing efficacy, physical condition, and behaviour of cleaner fish (corkwing wrasse Symphodus melops). The strategies tested were: (1) cleaner fishes only; (2) cleaner fishes and functional feed; (3) cleaner fishes, functional feed, and deep lights and feeding; and (4) cleaner fishes, functional feed, deep lights and feeding, and lice skirts. Corkwing wrasse were sampled from 3 cage-level replicates of each anti-lice strategy 3 times over 2 mo. Lice levels on salmon were recorded every 3 to 4 wk. Only 11% of corkwing wrasse had salmon lice in their gut, with individual wrasse having up to 72 lice in their stomach. Wrasse in cages encircled by lice skirts consumed one-ninth as many lice as those in other anti-lice treatments and had less overall impact on the number of lice per salmon. Fin, skin, mouth and eye condition, K factor, and observed cleaning behaviours of corkwing wrasse were similar across all anti-lice strategies. Our results demonstrate that different in-cage anti-lice strategies altered the magnitude of lice consumption in corkwing wrasse at this site and for this production period. Moreover, while a small proportion of corkwing wrasse appear to target lice as prey, most individual corkwing wrasse were ineffective biological control agents in a full-scale farm setting.


KEY WORDS: Biological control · Fish welfare · Lepeophtheirus salmonis · Lice skirts · Salmo salar · Symphodus melops


Full text in pdf format
Supplementary material 
Cite this article as: Gentry K, Bui S, Oppedal F, Dempster T (2020) Sea lice prevention strategies affect cleaner fish delousing efficacy in commercial Atlantic salmon sea cages. Aquacult Environ Interact 12:67-80. https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00348

Export citation
Mail this link - Contents Mailing Lists - RSS
Facebook - - linkedIn