Inter-Research > MEPS > v630 > p161-182  
MEPS
Marine Ecology Progress Series

via Mailchimp

MEPS 630:161-182 (2019)  -  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13135

Shining a light on the composition and distribution patterns of mesophotic and subphotic fish communities in Hawai‘i

Mariska Weijerman1,*, Arnaud Grüss2, Dayton Dove3,4, Jacob Asher4, Ivor D. Williams1, Christopher Kelley5, Jeffrey C. Drazen5

1NOAA Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, Honolulu, HI 96818, USA
2School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Box 355020, Seattle, WA 98105-5020, USA
3British Geological Survey, Edinburgh EH14-4AP, UK
4Joint Institute of Marine and Atmospheric Research, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
5Department of Oceanography, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
*Corresponding author:

ABSTRACT: As agencies shift from single-species management to ecosystem-based fisheries management, ecosystem models are gaining interest for understanding species dynamics in relation to oceanographic and ecological processes and human marine uses. However, information on community structure or distribution of many species that occupy deep (>30 m) waters is largely unavailable. We amassed a total of 24686 fish observations of 523 species/taxa for the 30-410 m depth areas surrounding the main Hawaiian Islands (MHI). We also obtained estimates of geomorphological variables, including substrate type, slope, rugosity, and ridge-like features. Using these 2 data sources, we (1) identified distinct fish communities along the 30-410 m depth gradient, and (2) generated relative biomass maps for fish functional groups. We showed that the mesophotic zone ranges between 30 and 129 m, with a fish faunal break at 60 m. Beyond this zone, 4 subphotic zones were identified: upper rariphotic (130-169 m), mid-rariphotic (170-239 m), lower rariphotic (240-319 m), and upper bathyal (320-410 m). We assigned fish species to functional groups partly based on identified depth ranges and fitted general additive models (GAMs) integrating geomorphological covariates to the functional group relative biomass estimates to determine the environmental variables that best predict the probability of encounter and relative biomass of each fish functional group. Finally, GAM predictions were employed to map functional group relative biomass distributions. These distribution maps showed a high relative biomass of many groups in the center of the MHI chain. This study contributes to a better understanding of fish community structure around the MHI and will inform ecosystem model parameterization.


KEY WORDS: Coral reef ecosystems · Mesophotic zone · Subphotic zone · Mesophotic coral ecosystems · Community structure · Generalized additive models · Spatial distribution maps · Fish


Full text in pdf format 
Supplementary material 
Cite this article as: Weijerman M, Grüss A, Dove D, Asher J, Williams ID, Kelley C, Drazen JTC (2019) Shining a light on the composition and distribution patterns of mesophotic and subphotic fish communities in Hawai‘i. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 630:161-182. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13135

Export citation
Mail this link - Contents Mailing Lists - RSS
Facebook - - linkedIn